TIGHTER THAN SKIN-TIGHT JEANS -- A FASHION REVIEW
by Anonymous
As a high school student in the mid-sixties one went along with the fashion of wearing one's pants very tight. The popular styles of slacks were designed to fit tightly, either low-waisted beltless Continental type, or the Crews Model with its waist at the navel and with wide belt loops and high cut front pockets. Both hugged the buns with a deep cut center seam and did not hide what one was packing in front. In either case the legs were stovepipe cut, very narrow from the hips and further tapering to the cuffless bottom, which was just above the anklebone, exposing a pair of bulky heather wool sox, slipped into loafers. A dark plaid button-down shirt and shaggy-styles sweater completed the look.
Most schools frowned on jeans, and in fact, usually had dress codes forbidding them. However, the dress codes referred to 'blue jeans" so the prohibition did not include the various new fashion earth-tones colors then available, nor corduroy jeans in similar colors. The brands of choice were first Wranglers and second Levis. Of course the jeans were designed to fit snugly, and by buying a size smaller than the standard, they definitely were skin-tight.
But one who was daring went beyond that look and selected in a favorite color -- usually loden green, bronze, or copper tan,-- a pair of jeans that fit as snugly as a rubber glove Jeans labeled "slim cut" were purchased a couple sizes smaller than traditional fit. One's genitals were carefully displayed with the testes balanced either side of the center seam and the penis pointing upwards to the right or left, depending on one's preference. A thin pair of briefs (or better yet, no underwear) were essential when one wore this style, as they were also for the more dressy tight pants.
Beyond that, if one had the body and the "balls" -- and could find the right jeans -- one could wear "tighter than skin-tight-jeans." Now, it was something if one wore this fat for alter school (usually in regular blue denim fabric), but the really courageous were seen wearing this fit in school, regardless of dress code inhibitions or not. A heavy leather belt secured the waist. It didn't matter for the look whether underwear were wore or not but they were considered superfluous.
It was easy for the wearer to determine if he was wearing that fit. An hour in a pair of tighter-than-skin-tight jeans and you had a numbing feeling in your genitalia, and perhaps: thighs, calves, and buttocks. Depending on one's actual waist compared with the measurement of the jeans waist, the jeans might squeeze your belly. When you removed the jeans the seams left indentations on both the inside and outside of your legs and along your hips. If the jeans had studs attaching the pockets and the belt loops, prominent 1/4 inch diameter marks were found in those positions.
Needless to say, these fashions kept the wearer well stimulated as to his sexuality and sexual urges, and he was more than ready to indulge in satisfying them. Similarly, these fashions kept the viewer in a similar condition.
0